DC Holds Hearing on Online Gaming - Rules Online Gaming Legal

On June 29, the DC City Council held a hearing on the future of online gaming/online poker in the District.   

6/29/2011: PUBLIC OVERSIGHT ROUNDTABLE, COMMITTEE ON FINANCE & REVENUE, Jack Evans, Chairperson

Click HERE to view the hearing on Windows Media Player. 

Skip ahead to the 3:06 mark to see someone you probably recognize!

If that doesn't work, go HERE and click on "View Meeting" for the following hearing.

6/29/2011: PUBLIC OVERSIGHT ROUNDTABLE, COMMITTEE ON FINANCE & REVENUE, Jack Evans, Chairperson

Allison Hazen Ward 6 Speech

Hi.   My name is Allison Hazen and I’ve been a DC resident since 1998 and a member of the Ward 6 community for nearly 10 years of that.   I chose to buy a home in Ward 6, in part, because of the good work Tommy Wells has done.  However, on this particular issue, I’m afraid that I don’t agree with him.

I have been a poker player for more than 20 years.    Because there wasn’t a regulated environment in which to play, I, like many other players, was a victim and lost money on Full Tilt.  Now I have to drive to Charlestown or to Delaware Park to play, which is costly and takes revenue away from the District.  My friend Rick Howard -- right over there -- has parents who are 81 and 82 years old. They drive to Charlestown to play.  I’d like a safe environment in which to play online, and I’d imagine that his parents as they get older would welcome a safe place to play that wouldn’t require them to get out and drive late at night to another state.

Tommy Wells has asked that the community weigh in on iGaming.  I’ve attended several of these city council meetings and I’ve been impressed by the large numbers of residents who support iGaming in the District for a number of reasons.   A recent Washington Times poll showed that 85% of people support the legalization of online poker.  The response is overwhelmingly in favor.  However, there have been some concerns that I’d like to address briefly and respond to:

1.       The argument has been made that DC shouldn’t be the first in the Nation to vote on this. 

a.       When has it ever been wrong to be the 1^st to do something if it’s the right thing to do?  As the sister of a gay brother, I am proud that DC was brave enough to finally grant him the civil rights he deserves.  We didn’t sit back and wait for all the other states.  We forged ahead and made history.

b.      Additionally, Poker and DC have a history as old as the country itself so perhaps it’s only fitting that we be the first.  George Washington and Abraham Lincoln both were card players.  Franklin Roosevelt can be heard shuffling poker chips during several of his Fireside Chats.  Harry Truman was an avid poker player and his “the buck stops here,” references the Dealer Button (which was called a Buck) that moves around a poker table.  Our very own Barack Obama is a poker player.

2.       I’ve also heard the argument the expected revenue is too small to justify any associated risks.

a.       That small revenue, as Councilman Brown has noted, would provide shelter for 85 needy families. 

b.      Additionally – and since I come from a family of teachers this one is especially important to me – that small revenue would pay for the annual salary of 56 teachers in the District.

c.       A small amount can do so much.

3.       I’ve heard complaints about how the measure was introduced.  That it was “slipped into” the budget in a sneaky manner.

a.       Similar measures are a regular part of the annual budget process.  This year’s budget features several new additions (such as Changes to Eligibility for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) – none of which were opened up for public scrutiny.   

b.      The iGaming provision was a creative solution to help meet DC’s budgetary shortfalls.  It was only appropriate that it be a part of the budget.

4.       I’ve also heard complaints that we don’t need money if it comes from gambling revenue.

a.       Current Games already offered include Powerball, DC Daily 6, DC-5, DC-4, Keno, Mega Millions numerous scratch tickets, as well as charity raffles and charity poker tournaments.  It’s already legal to play poker in the District and it’s already being managed by the DC Lottery.  The only change is here that we’d like the ability to do so online.

b.      The argument against iGaming is the equivalent of saying that it’s okay to buy groceries in the store, but that you should not be able to order them online.

These Community meetings have been great.  We’ve learned that most residents support online gaming and that a lot of the concerns of those who don’t center on where the money should be spent and on who will oversee issues as they arise – not with iGaming itself. 

I was just at the Ward 8 council meeting in Anacostia last week.  Not a single person in the room spoke out against this measure.  Many spoke in favor of the revenue and of what it could do for their community. 

There isn’t a single new law that’s perfect at the beginning.  That’s why feedback like this is so good.  But to take an excellent idea that could really benefit the District and derail it based on technicalities isn’t fare to District residents who could so clearly benefit from this revenue.

I want to thank Tommy Wells for his continued work for the District.  Although I disagree with you on this issue, I applaud you for the other 99% of what you do for us daily.

REPRINTED HERE WITH ALLISON'S PERMISSION
FROM WARD 6 COMMUNITY MEETING - NOVEMBER 20, 2011 - 6:30pm-8:30 - Eastern Market - North Hall

Yvonne Mattiello Ward 6 Speech

        Thank you for this opportunity. My name is Yvonne Mattiello and I am a free-lance

certified deaf interpreter working primarily out of Ward 6.  I work down the street at

Gallaudet University and at other interpreting agencies in and around Washington, D.C.

        I have enjoyed playing online poker and other online games for years with my deaf

friends at home and at tournaments hosted by the National Deaf Poker Tournament

(NDPT) at Atlantic City, NJ.  I was asked by a group of Deaf poker players to come and

share with you our experiences playing at casinos and online games.

       Before NDPT was found and while I lived in Philadelphia before I moved here, I used to

go to Atlantic City to play games alone or with a few deaf friends. I don’t go there

anymore except for NDPT tournaments, which are held twice every year in March and

November. When I discovered and tried out online games, I like it much better for many

different reasons, in addition to the reasons you may have seen mentioned anywhere in

blogs

        Online games gives more various solutions as well as equal access to different groups of

people like deaf people, hard of hearing people, deaf blind people as well as foreigners

who cannot understand English in live games. There were many misunderstandings that

happened to us, deaf and hard of hearing people at live games because many of us were

not able to solve or express our concerns. I know some deaf blind people who prefer

online games better because they do not have to depend on others for communication or

transportation.

        My deaf friends and I have experienced discrimination or barriers many times at various

casinos. For instance, hearing people who were friends together could play together at

cash tables but my Deaf friends and I could not play together sometimes at the same table because dealers were “concerned” thinking that we could cheat because we could

communicate in sign language that was unfamiliar to them and hearing players. This kind

of barrier is not unique to deaf and hard of hearing players, as some foreigners might

experience similar communication barriers or discrimination due to language differences.

           The other main reason why I like online games especially poker is that I can see typed

announcements and chat with other players in chat boxes. I can choose which games I

want to play online while at casinos, I missed many last-minute announcements over

loudspeakers and could not play games that I wanted to play. I also missed my name

being called when I waited for an open seat at the table of my choice. I could not follow

the conversation or discussions over rules that occur frequently at the tables. The

dealers and hearing players become impatient or aggravated when a deaf player like

myself misunderstands certain verbal instructions. I have been accused for causing

these problems a few times and as a result, I either do poorly in the game or was forced

to leave the table before the game was over. When things go well as they rarely do, it is

mostly because dealers, waitresses, casino workers and other players are aware of the

communication barriers that Deaf and hard of hearing players face every day.

         The third and last reason is that the buy-in fees at cash tables in the casinos sometimes

got increased to $10 or more and schedules were announced over the loudspeakers with

no written information that it became impossible to find a table where I could play for five

dollars or less. It would cost me much more money to go out to casinos than playing

online. I tend to spend up to 100 dollars per month online or at casinos depending on

how many dollars I have available to play with.

         I strongly support local government-run online games because they can collect revenues and

provide solutions that we all need in our local communities.

I hope you will put these under your consideration and let us play online. Thank you for hearing me out. 


REPRINTED HERE WITH YVONNE MATTIELLO'S PERMISSION.
FROM WARD 6 COMMUNITY MEETING - NOVEMBER 20 - 6:30pm-8:30 - Eastern Market - North Hall